MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The impact of family history of diabetes on risk factors for gestational diabetes

2007· article· en· W1969964903 on OpenAlexaff
Ravi Retnakaran, Philip W. Connelly, Mathew Sermer, Bernard Zinman, Anthony J. Hanley

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Endocrinology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestational diabetesMedicineAdiponectinInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesEndocrinologyFamily historyPregnancyPopulationParity (physics)ObstetricsArea under the curveGynecologyInsulin resistanceGestationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Familial history of type 2 diabetes (FHD) represents a pathophysiologically unique risk factor for gestational diabetes (GDM), insofar as it encompasses both inherited and lifestyle elements. We thus hypothesized that the risk factors for gestational hyperglycaemia in women with FHD may differ from those in women without FHD. DESIGN/PATIENTS/MEASUREMENTS: GDM risk factors were evaluated in 90 women with FHD and in 83 women without FHD, at the time of oral glucose tolerance testing in late pregnancy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, the insulin-sensitizing protein adiponectin, glucose tolerance status and area-under-the-glucose-curve (AUC(gluc)). In women with FHD, a multiple linear regression model of established GDM risk factors reconciled 35% of the variance in AUC(gluc), with (i) previous GDM (t = 3.74, P = 0.0003) identified as a positive independent determinant and (ii) log adiponectin (t = -3.48, P = 0.0008) and, unexpectedly, parity (t = -3.19, P = 0.0021) emerging as negative independent covariates of AUC(gluc). In contrast, in women without FHD, the same multivariate model reconciled only 15% of the variance in AUC(gluc), with no significant variables identified. Interestingly, in the entire population (n = 173), parity significantly modified the relationship between FHD and AUC(gluc) (FHD-parity interaction: t = -2.29, P = 0.0235). Indeed, FHD was an independent determinant of AUC(gluc) in nulliparous women (n = 91), but not in parous women (n = 82). CONCLUSION: Established risk factors for GDM are relevant in women with FHD but may not be the principal determinants of gestational hyperglycaemia in women without FHD. Moreover, FHD may be more relevant to risk of GDM in nulliparous women than in parous subjects. These findings highlight the complex relationship between FHD and gestational hyperglycaemia, and may hold implications for selective screening for GDM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical EndocrinologySame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207