MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970077602 · doi:10.3201/eid1612.100451

Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Outbreak at Canadian Forces Cadet Camp

2010· article· en· W1970077602 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rhonda Y. Kropp, Laura E. Bogaert, Robert Barber, François‐William Tremblay, Robert H. Ennis, Martin Tepper, Robert Pless, Nathalie Bastien, Yan Li, Carole Beaudoin, James C. Anderson, Louise Pelletier, Rachel Rodin

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerging infectious diseases · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersHealth CanadaCenters for Disease Control and PreventionMinistère de la Défense NationalePublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsCadetOutbreakPandemicMedicineVirologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BiosecuritySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)AsthmaImmunologyInternal medicineGeographyPathologyDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We conducted a case-control study to describe the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of an outbreak of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 at a Canadian military cadet training center. We found that asthma and obesity confer greater risk for infection. Viral shedding was detected by PCR up to 18 days after symptom onset. O n July 29, 2009, the Public Health Agency of Canada was notifi ed of an outbreak of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 at the Army Cadet Summer Training Centre Argonaut at Canadian Forces Base, Gagetown, New Brunswick. The Cadet Summer Training Centre camp opened in early July and ran sessions lasting 2-6 weeks. The camp setting was semiclosed, with limited movement on and off camp. A case-control study was conducted to describe transmission, clinical characteristics, viral shedding, and risk factors for infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerging infectious diseasesSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207