MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1970094898 · doi:10.1029/2012jc008134

The dynamics of internal wave resonance in periodically forced narrow basins

2012· article· en· W1970094898 on OpenAlexaff
Leon Boegman, Gregory N. Ivey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeicheInternal waveDissipationPhysicsAmplitudeInternal tideForcing (mathematics)MechanicsResonance (particle physics)GeologyAtmospheric sciencesOpticsAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the steady state internal wave response of a periodically forced, density‐stratified, basin characterized by both horizontal and vertical length scales and a known seiche period. The system was two‐layer stratified and was subjected to periodic forcing over a wide frequency range. The forcing amplitude and ratio of the forcing frequency ( σ f ) to horizontal mode one (H1) internal seiche frequency ( σ 1 ) governed the system response. For σ f > σ 1 , higher‐mode internal seiches were observed; for σ f < σ 1 , a nonresonant forced H1 internal seiche was observed; and for σ f → σ 1 , a resonant H1 internal seiche was observed. For this resonant regime, progressive nonlinear internal waves (NLIWs) formed upon the H1 seiche. When the NLIWs amplitudes were large, Kelvin‐Helmholtz instabilities grew within the wave troughs, leading to significant diapycnal mixing within the basin interior. Resonant amplification was most pronounced for small forcing amplitudes because weakly forced waves have the most potential for growth prior to energy flux to NLIWs and ultimate turbulent dissipation and mixing. This observation suggests that each mode has a maximum energy density that, when exceeded, leads to a nonlinear energy cascade. The resonant wave response was modeled as a driven underdamped harmonic oscillator, where the damping coefficient was interpreted as the sum of the effects of mixing and dissipation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→