MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970144467 · doi:10.1185/03007995.2012.762903

The long-term clinical benefit and effectiveness of switching to once-daily quetiapine extended release in patients with schizophrenia

2013· article· en· W1970144467 on OpenAlexafffund
Pierre Chue, Ashok Malla, Roch-Hugo Bouchard, Sarah J. Lessard, Soma Ganesan, Émmanuel Stip, Sunny Johnson, Eric Chen, Yong Min Ahn, Sejoong Kim, Gail Robinson, C. Schweikert, Alain Gendron, Hans Eriksson

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Medical Research and Opinion · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of OttawaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaMcGill University
FundersMylanValeant Pharmaceuticals International
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineQuetiapineDiscontinuationClinical Global ImpressionSomnolenceOlanzapineAdverse effectInternal medicineQuetiapine FumarateAnticholinergicAntipsychoticClinical endpointExtrapyramidal symptomsAtypical antipsychoticSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Clinical trialPsychiatryPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term clinical benefit and effectiveness of switching to once-daily quetiapine extended release (XR) from an oral antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia. Reasons for switching included insufficient efficacy, tolerability, and/or non-acceptability. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving an improvement in Clinical Global Impression - Clinical Benefit (CGI-CB) scale scores. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 24-week, international, multicentre, open-label, prospective study ( www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT00640601). After a 7-14 day enrolment period (depending whether prior antipsychotic mono- or combination therapy), all patients received quetiapine XR 300 mg once daily (day 1), 600 mg/day (day 2), 600-800 mg/day (day 3) and 400-800 mg/day thereafter, with down-titration and discontinuation of prior antipsychotic by day 4. RESULTS: A total of 62% of patients completed the study and 56.9% (LOCF, ITT) achieved a significant improvement in CGI-CB (95% CI [0.51, 0.63]; p = 0.02). Switches due to insufficient efficacy showed a significant improvement (60%, 95% CI [0.51, 0.68]; p = 0.02), compared to 54.4% ([0.44, 0.64]; p = 0.38) and 52.4% ([0.36, 0.68]; p = 0.76) of switches due to insufficient tolerability and non-acceptability respectively (both p = ns). Patients previously on olanzapine and quetiapine IR showed a significant improvement in CGI-CB (62.6% [p = 0.02] and 61.2% [p = 0.04], respectively). Somnolence (18.0%) and dizziness (14.6%) were the main adverse events. Anticholinergic use decreased from 7.1 to 2.7%. Overall mean weight gain was 0.4 kg; 12.9% of patients experienced a weight gain of ≥7% and 15% experienced a clinically relevant shift in triglycerides from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients switched from other antipsychotics to quetiapine XR experienced clinical benefit. This was supported by all other efficacy outcomes regardless of the reason for switching. Safety data confirmed quetiapine XR was safe and well tolerated. The open-label design and lack of a placebo group represent limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Medical Research and OpinionSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207