MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970181446 · doi:10.1080/0035919x.2012.756075

Mineralogical and geochemical analyses of the healing elements in clayey soils from Isinuka traditional spa in Port St Johns, South Africa

2013· article· en· W1970181446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ndze Denis Jumbam

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Royal Society of South Africa · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsClay mineralsMineralogyEnvironmental chemistryClay soilGeologySoil waterGeochemistryChemistrySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Clay from Isinuka Springs in the Port St Johns area of the Eastern Cape of South Africa is used by local people for cosmetic purposes and for the treatment of an array of ailments and diseases. This study relates the acclaimed cosmetic and therapeutic properties of the clay to its mineralogical and geochemical composition and properties. The clay samples were dried and their pH measured. They were all found to be alkaline. Particle size distribution experiments were carried out. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyses detected various amounts of As, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sr, U and Zn in the samples. The highest mean concentration of an element recorded was for Sr, with a mean value of 2550 ppm. X-ray diffraction was used to elucidate the mineralogical composition of the samples. Results showed that the clay, though useful for therapeutic and cosmetic purposes, poses a health risk, especially on repeated exposure. The acclaimed dermatological properties of the clays may be ascribed to the presence of S, Cu, Zn, Ti and As in the samples. Microbiological analysis of the samples may shed more light on the possible medicinal properties of the clays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Royal Society of South AfricaSame topicTherapeutic Uses of Natural ElementsFrench-language works237,207