MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970187449 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.40.6.1705

PHASE-EQUILIBRIUM CONSTRAINTS ON THE MAGMATIC ORIGIN OF LAURITE + Ru Os Ir ALLOY

2002· article· en· W1970187449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetallurgical and Alloy Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAlloyPhase (matter)GeochemistryGeologyMaterials scienceMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To more completely assess the origin of associated laurite (RuS2) and Ru–Os–Ir (IPGE) alloy which are found as inclusions in near-liquidus phenocrysts such as chromian spinel, we conducted experiments to evaluate the effects of T and f (S2) on phase relations in the system Ru–Os–Ir–Cu–S. Cu–S melt (added as a flux) + IPGE metals were held in silica crucibles, and experiments were done in both vertical-tube gas-mixing furnace apparatus [low f (S2)] and evacuated silica tubes [higher f (S2) buffered by Pt–PtS] at 1200–1250°C for 1–3 days. At constant f (S2) of 10−1 atm, the two-phase field of laurite + alloy is restricted to only the most Ru-rich bulk compositions ( X Ru > 0.85) at 1250°C, and slightly expands to encompass more Ru-poor compositions ( X Ru > 0.6) at 1200°C. At this f (S2), laurite remains very close to pure RuS2. An increase in sulfur fugacity to 10−0.39 atm at 1200°C and 10−0.07 atm at 1250°C resulted in a considerable expansion of the two-phase field, with both laurite and alloy dissolving more Os + Ir. For example, at 1250°C and f (S2) of 10−0.07, the Os and Ir content of laurite increases to ~20 and ~12 at.%, respectively. Coexisting alloys in both sets of high- f (S2) experiments contain less than 15 at.% Ru. The compositions of laurite and IPGE alloy defined by high- f (S2) experiments show remarkable similarity to coexisting PGM compositions preserved in natural chromitite from several localities. If such phases are the product of entrapment at the magmatic stage, then high- f (S2) conditions are inferred. Similarly, the bulk compositions of laurite from suites in which IPGE alloy is absent also suggest similarly high f (S2), if high-temperature entrapment is assumed. Limits on the f (O2) of magmas that may precipitate alloy–laurite pairs stem from the requirement that such magmas remain sulfide-liquid-undersaturated, at least until PGM are trapped in their phenocryst host. Calculations suggest that for this to occur at high f (S2), laurite + IPGE alloy precipitation requires the involvement of relatively oxidized, low-FeO magmas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it