MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970220222 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.090213

Risedronate in the Treatment of Mild Pediatric Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

2009· article· en· W1970220222 on OpenAlexafffund
Frank Rauch, Craig F. Munns, Christof Land, Moira Cheung, Francis H. Glorieux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsShriners Hospitals for Children - Canada
FundersMcGill UniversityProcter and Gamble
KeywordsOsteogenesis imperfectaMedicinePlaceboRandomized controlled trialPediatricsInternal medicinePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intravenous pamidronate is the most widely used treatment for moderate to severe osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Currently, there is no medical treatment for patients with mild OI. We conducted a single-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to examine the efficacy and safety of oral risedronate in the treatment of pediatric patients with mild OI. A total of 26 children and adolescents (age, 6.1-17.7 yr; 11 girls) with OI type I were randomized to either placebo (N = 13) or risedronate (N = 13) for 2 yr. Risedronate doses were 15 mg once per week in patients weighing <40 kg and 30 mg once per week in patients weighing >40 kg. After 2 yr of treatment, risedronate decreased serum levels of the bone resorption marker collagen type I N-telopeptide by 35% compared with a 6% reduction with placebo (p = 0.003). Risedronate increased lumbar spine areal BMD Z-scores by 0.65, whereas patients receiving placebo experienced a decrease of 0.15 (p = 0.002). In contrast, no significant treatment differences in bone mass and density were found at the radial metaphysis and diaphysis, the hip, and the total body. Histomorphometric analysis of transiliac bone biopsies at the end of the study period did not show a significant treatment difference in cortical width, trabecular bone volume, or parameters of bone turnover. Similarly, there was no detectable treatment effect on vertebral morphometry, second metacarpal cortical width, grip force, bone pain, or number of new fractures. Regarding safety, risedronate was generally well tolerated, and the incidence of clinical or laboratory adverse experiences was similar among treatment groups. These results suggest that the skeletal effects of oral risedronate are weaker than those that are commonly observed with intravenous pamidronate treatment but still lead to an increase in lumbar spine areal BMD. Future studies should investigate whether oral risedronate is effective in reducing fracture rates in children and adolescents with mild OI type I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations120
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207