MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970235861 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2003-45379

Multi-Channel R134a Two-Phase Flow Measurement Technique for Automobile Air-Conditioning System

2003· article· en· W1970235861 on OpenAlexaff
Junjie Gu, Masahiro Kawaji, T. Smith-Pollard, James S. Cotton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMass flow meterFlow measurementMaterials scienceRefrigerantTwo-phase flowVolumetric flow rateThermal mass flow meterMass flow rateMechanicsEvaporatorUltrasonic flow meterHeat exchangerFlow coefficientMass flowFlow (mathematics)ThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an improved on-line measurement technique developed to study two-phase flow rate distributions of refrigerants in parallel flow channels of compact heat exchangers and evaporators used in automotive air-conditioning systems. A prototype test station containing a refrigerant flow loop and a multi-channel two-phase flow measuring system, was designed and constructed based on the stratification of two-phase flow in horizontal tubes with relatively large diameters. In this work, glass tubes of 1”, 1.5” and 2” diameter were tested. Upon entering the glass tube, a vapour-liquid refrigerant mixture would readily stratify and the mean velocities of vapour and liquid phases could be measured separately using a hot film anemometer and an ultrasonic flow meter, respectively. Scales taped onto the glass tubes were also used to determine the mean liquid levels, from which the flow area of each phase could be calculated. The product of the flow area, phase density and mean phase velocity would then yield the mass flow rate of each phase. Validation experiments have been performed with R-134a as the working fluid and a 3-channel evaporator test section, designed with three separate outlets and kept under an adiabatic condition. The sum of the flow rates in the glass tubes for each phase was compared with the vapour or liquid flow rate determined from the total mass flow rate measured at the evaporator inlet and a heat balance in the pre-heater section of the pump-driven refrigerant flow loop. Validation tests yielded satisfactory results for both vapor and liquid phases, indicating the soundness of the measurement system based on the stratification tubes as well as the use of an ultrasonic flow meter and hot-film anemometer probes for phase average velocity measurements. The present measurement system has been equipped with seven glass tubes and thus can be used to study liquid and vapor flow rate distributions in commercial compact heat exchangers and improve their performance in automobile air conditioning systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207