MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of Cervical Human Papillomavirus Infection by In Situ Hybridization in Fetuses from Women with Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions

2005· article· en· W1970239253 on OpenAlexaff
Lance R. Bruck, Sui Zee, Brad Poulos, David Carroll, Maria Abadi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIn situ hybridizationKoilocytePathologyFetusCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaHPV infectionCervixEpitheliumHuman papillomavirusPapillomaviridaeCervical cancerCancerPregnancyBiologyInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the cervix of fetuses from mothers with documented squamous intraepithelial lesions. METHODS: Fetal cervical epithelium was obtained from the Human Fetal Tissue Repository as per Institutional Review Board protocol. Fetal cervical epithelium was dissected, fixed in formalin, and embedded in paraffin. Sections were tested by in situ hybridization using a wide-spectrum HPV DNA probe. Cases were specimens from mothers with low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and controls were specimens from women with no documented squamous intraepithelial lesions. RESULTS: A total of 14 controls and 10 cases were evaluated for HPV DNA. No reactivity was detected in the controls. Two cases showed focal intracellular reactivity with the HPV DNA probe. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrate fetal cervical HPV infection due to intrauterine exposure. These findings have important implications in understanding the pathogenesis of cervical neoplasia and its management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lower Genital Tract DiseaseSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207