MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970287453 · doi:10.2514/6.2003-5203

Effect of Peroxide Additives on the Detonation Sensitivity of Hydrocarbon Fuels

2003· article· en· W1970287453 on OpenAlexaff
David Landry, Carine Grand, Andrew Higgins

Bibliographic record

Venue39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetonationHydrocarbonSensitivity (control systems)PeroxideChemistryChemical engineeringMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceWaste managementExplosive materialOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of peroxides on the detonation sensitivity of a representative hydrocarbon fuel is experimentally investigated. The peroxides (tert-butyl hydroperoxide and hydrogen peroxide in water solution) were added to decane fuel in vapor form. The fuel/oxygen mixtures were prepared at elevated temperatures and injected into a heated detonation tube at temperatures between 150 – 250 oC and at pressures of 7.6 – 9 kPa. The mixtures were spark ignited and the distance required for the flame to accelerate to a detonation was measured via fiber optics. The results show that the addition of these peroxides does not result in a reduction in the run up distance to detonation. As the concentration of the peroxides is increased, the run up distance increases, indicating a reduction in sensitivity. The addition of tert-butyl hydroperoxide results in a shift of the maximum sensitivity to very fuel rich conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and ExhibitSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207