Diversity comparison and phylogenetic relationships of cocksfoot (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i> L.) germplasm as revealed by SSR markers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phylogenetic relationships among and within 16 accessions collected from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, India and Japan were investigated using SSR markers. The 21 SSR primer pairs generated a total of 143 polymorphic alleles, with an average of 6.8 alleles per locus, and a range of 3-13 alleles. The average genetic diversity, as measured by the polymorphic information content (PIC), was 0.33. The average polymorphic rate (P) for this species was 90.7%, suggesting a high degree of genetic diversity. Analysis of molecular variation (AMOVA) revealed larger genetic variation within accessions (65.75%) and geographical regions (75.58%) rather than between them, while among ploidy level variance contributed only 2.62%. A high degree of genetic diversity within tetraploid group was detected based on the polymorphic rate (P = 94.23%) and shannon’ s information index of diversity (I = 0.4300) when compared with diploid group (P = 91.25%, I = 0.3922). The values of the genetic identity (GI) among accessions ranged from 0.7320 to 0.9691 and were used to produce a dendrogram using the UPGMA approach. The 16 accessions were grouped into two major clusters (GI = 0.876); specifically, all tetraploid (2n = 4x = 28) accessions originating from different regions were grouped into the same cluster, whereas the diploid (2n = 2x = 14) accessions were grouped into the two major clusters. The dendrogram was concordant with the morphological variability, agronomic traits and karyotype. Generally, the results of this study indicate that cocksfoot germplasm contains high molecular variation within accession and geographical region. The implications of these results for conversation of the species were discussed.Key words: Dactylis glomerata L.; simple sequence repeats; genetic diversity; phylogenetic relationship
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".