Vibration suppression using two-terminal flywheel. Part I: Modeling and characterization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is only one manipulation terminal for a flywheel in terms of the topology, which remains a potential bottleneck for its application in mechanical systems. This paper presents a two-terminal manipulation approach for the flywheel using the inverse screw transmission which yields the relative translation between two terminals resulting from the rotation of the flywheel. A dynamics model is accordingly put forward to describe both an ideal two-terminal mass and a non-ideal case including factors such as structure mass, friction, backlash and elastic effect. A prototype device is manufactured and subsequently characterized using a vibration rig to identify the model parameters. The results show that, in the commonly used frequency band, the effect of non-ideal factors is insignificant and thus the device can be regarded as an ideal two-terminal mass. However, the impact of the non-ideal factors should be taken into account in the other frequency ranges. The proposed two-terminal approach releases the ground terminal of the flywheel and has a great application potential in vibration control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it