Evidence for a Common Neural Mechanism Mediating Growth Hormone-Releasing Factor-Induced and Somatostatin-lnduced Feeding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have previously reported that the somatotropin regulatory peptides, growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRF) and somatostatin (SS) increase feeding when applied centrally in low picomole-range doses. The similarity between the dose-response characteristics and photoperiod sensitivities of these two peptide's feeding effects, together with indirect evidence suggesting that these peptides interact functionally within the hypothalamus, suggests that GRF and SS may induce feeding via a common neural mechanism. The present studies sought to investigate this possibility. In the first experiment combined intracerebroventricular (icv) injections of optimal doses of GRF and SS were found to be less potent than icv injections of GRF or SS alone, suggesting that the mechanisms mediating GRF-induced and SS-induced feeding are not totally independent. In further studies, icv injections of antiserum raised against SS blocked GRF-induced feeding. In contrast, icv injections of antiserum raised against GRF were ineffective in blocking SS-induced feeding. These results suggest that SS may act downstream to GRF in a putative neural feeding mechanism which utilizes both peptides. The possible anatomical basis for such a feeding mechanism involving GRF and SS is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".