Cavity ring-down spectroscopy with a pulsed distributed feedback quantum cascade laser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A pulsed distributed feedback quantum cascade laser operating near 970 cm<sup>-1</sup> (10.3 μm) was coupled with the technique of cavity ring-down spectroscopy, as described here for the first time. The newly constructed set-up was tested by recording three relatively weak rotational lines of the 10<sup>0</sup>0→00<sup>0</sup>1 vibrational band of CO<sub>2</sub> in the range from 966.75 cm<sup>-1</sup> to 971.5 cm<sup>-1</sup>. The CO<sub>2</sub> lines were recorded by measuring the decay time of a CO<sub>2</sub> - N<sub>2</sub> mixture flowing through an open sample tube placed between the cavity ring-down mirrors. The quantum cascade laser frequency was tuned at a rate of ~ 0.071 cm<sup>-1</sup>/K by changing the heat sink temperature in the range between -20 and 50 °C. The first results demonstrated the applicability and high sensitivity of the cavity ring-down spectroscopy - pulsed quantum cascade laser combination and encouraged us to extend our research to the study and detection of ammonia. We demonstrated that a detection limit of ammonia of ~ 25 ppbv can be attained with the current set-up. Basic instrument performance and optimization of the experimental parameters for sensitivity improvement are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".