Further evidence for the role of gap junctions in the delayed antiarrhythmic effect of cardiac pacing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The objective of this study was to provide evidence that gap junctions are involved in the delayed antiarrhythmic effect of cardiac pacing. Twenty-four dogs were paced through the right ventricle (4 × 5 min, rate of 240 beats/min) 24 h prior to a 25 min occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Some of these paced dogs were infused with 50 (n = 7) or 100 μmol/L (n = 7) of the gap junction uncoupler carbenoxolone (CBX), prior to and during the occlusion. Ten sham-paced dogs, subjected only to occlusion, served as the controls. Cardiac pacing markedly reduced the number of ectopic beats and episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT), as well the incidence of VT and ventricular fibrillation during occlusion. The changes in severity of ischaemia and tissue electrical resistance were also less marked compared with the unpaced controls. Pacing also preserved the permeability of gap junctions, the phosphorylation of connexin43, and the structural integrity of the intercalated discs. The closing of gap junctions with CBX prior to and during ischaemia markedly attenuated or even abolished these protective effects of pacing. CONCLUSION: Our results support the previous findings that gap junctions play a role in the delayed antiarrhythmic effect of cardiac pacing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".