MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970579734 · doi:10.1517/14656566.8.18.3133

Management of glioblastoma

2007· review· en· W1970579734 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tomokazu Aoki, Nobuo Hashimoto, Masao Matsutani

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTemozolomideCarmustineLomustineRadiation therapyOncologyGliomaChemotherapyAdjuvantInternal medicineGlioblastomaChemoradiotherapyCancer researchCyclophosphamide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are among the most devastating neoplasms claiming the lives of patients within a median of 1 year after diagnosis. Treatment of GBM requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and so on. Temozolomide (TMZ) has emerged as an active agent against malignant gliomas. On the basis of the work by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/National Cancer Institute of Canada, concurrent radiotherapy and the oral alkylating agent TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ has become the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, although the methylation status of the O(6)-mehylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter is predictive for survival of GBM patients. Gliadel is a biodegradable polymer wafer impregnated with carmustine. Gliadel has been one of the few treatment modalities to demonstrate a statistical benefit in patients with malignant glioma. These new FDA approved drugs advanced the treatment of malignant glioma, but more progress is needed. Patients require improvements in chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotoxin using the convection-enhanced delivery and more.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on PharmacotherapySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207