MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970596461 · doi:10.1002/jcb.21170

Tissue‐specific expression of Riken 2810430M08 and its function in T‐cell immune responses

2006· article· en· W1970596461 on OpenAlexafffund
Tao Wu, Shen‐Jiang Hu, Xiaoying Qiao, Hongyu Luo, Jiangping Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Notre-Dame
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart And Stroke Foundation Of QuebecHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsBiologyImmune systemLymphokineCell biologyIn situ hybridizationT cellTransgeneGene expressionImmunologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Riken 2810430M08 is a gene with unknown functions. According to in situ hybridization (ISH), it presented a pattern of temporal expression, peaking in the mid-gestation (embryonic Days e9-e14) stage in most tissues. In the late-gestation stage and during the adulthood, Riken 2810430M08 was expressed in some tissues with and without a robust proliferation program. Thus, the gene might have important functions that are related and unrelated to proliferation. Its expression was induced after T-cell receptor stimulation in T cells. However, transgenic mice with actin promoter-driven expression of Riken 2810430M08 showed normal in vitro and in vivo T cells responses, such as fetal thymus development, adult T cells activation marker expression, lymphokine secretion, proliferation and migration, and delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH). The expression of Riken 2810430M08 during ontogeny has provided useful clues for further investigation. Additional studies are warranted to examine its role in immune and other systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207