MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Projected Burden of Enteric Bacterial Infections Under Climate Change Scenarios

2006· article· en· W1970619622 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manon Fleury, Dominique F. Charron

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeDisease burdenEnvironmental healthBurden of diseaseWaterborne diseasesVulnerability (computing)PopulationGeographyEnvironmental scienceMedicineOutbreakBiologyEcologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MS5-03 Abstract: A number of studies have shown an effect of ambient temperature on the occurrence of certain enteric diseases after controlling for seasonal and long-term trends, suggesting a vulnerability to increased enteric diseases because of climate change. The WHO estimates that in 2030 the risk of diarrheal diseases will be up to 10% higher in some regions because of climate change. In this study, we are interested in determining what additional burden of enteric diseases might be seen in Canada under selected climate change scenarios using models from the Hadley Centre and the Canadian Centre for Climate Modeling. Enteric diseases are already an important burden in Canada and are sensitive to variations in temperature and precipitation. With time series methods, we project the future burden of enteric disease based on national notifiable and hospitalization data of enteric bacterial infections using age-specific rates, future population growth, and socioeconomic status. Ten cities in Canada were selected between 1992 and 2000. We used downscaled climate change model data Hadley 3 and CGCM2 models to project future burden of disease under climate scenarios 2030, 2050, and 2080.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207