Which Is First: Left Anterior Descending Artery Anastomosis or Right Coronary Artery Anastomosis in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The sequence of the distal anastomosis for revascularization in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) surgery is under debate. The hypothesis in this study was that an analysis of cardiac markers would reveal that anastomosing the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) before the right coronary artery (RCA) would decrease myocardial damage in OPCABG surgery for 2-vessel disease. METHODS: Forty patients with stable angina who underwent OPCABG surgery and who had LAD and RCA lesions were randomized into 2 groups of 20 patients each. The LAD was revascularized first in group 1, and the RCA was revascularized first in group 2. Cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase (CK), and CK myocardial band (CK-MB) were measured in the 2 groups before surgery and at 8, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: No mortality occurred in the 2 groups. The groups were similar with respect to sex, age, durations of anastomosis of the left internal thoracic artery to the LAD and of the saphenous vein graft to the RCA, and preoperative CK, CK-MB, and troponin I levels. Postoperative CK-MB levels were significantly higher in group 2 in the eighth and 24th postoperative hours than in group 1 (P = .009 and .041, respectively). Similarly, troponin I levels were significantly higher in group 2 in the eighth, 24th, and 48th hours than in group 1 (P = .003, .003, and .006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis to the LAD first in OPCABG surgery led to a slight reduction in myocardial enzyme release against the occlusion of the target vessels during anastomoses in patients with RCA and LAD stenoses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".