MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970700520 · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.prev-09-a22

Abstract A22: Spirometric surveillance for premalignant and malignant bronchial lesions

2010· article· en· W1970700520 on OpenAlexaff
Vijayvel Jayaprakash, Gregory Loewen, Samjot S. Dhillon, Martin C. Mahoney, Machare Delgado, Ravi Menezes, Paul N. Bogner, Saikrishna S. Yendamuri, Kyle Hogarth, Mary Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Prevention Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineLung cancerOdds ratioCancerBiopsyDysplasiaVital capacityRisk factorCOPDSquamous metaplasiaGastroenterologyPathologyLungLung function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer (LC) are diseases that share common risk factors. It has been reported that more than half of the patients diagnosed with LC also suffer from COPD. Although COPD is a well known risk factor for LC, the relationship between impaired lung function (LF) and the incidence and progression of pre-malignant lesions (PMLs) in the central airways is still unclear. Methods: The study included 217 high-risk patients from a hospital-based lung cancer surveillance cohort who underwent bronchoscopy with endobronchial biopsy of suspicious lesions, at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York. All patients had lung function measurement within 6 months preceding their baseline biopsy. Baseline histopathology diagnoses included 91squamous metaplasia (SM), 25 squamous dysplasia (SD), 1 in-situ carcinoma and 5 invasive bronchial carcinoma. Follow-up bronchoscopy and biopsy were performed on 69 patients. Sixteen patients had a progression of the baseline lesion to a higher grade. The relationship between the baseline LF measures and the incidence and progression of PMLs were examined using regression models. Results: Patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted (FEV1%) of <50% had 4.5 times greater risk of being diagnosed with PML/cancer, when compared to patients with FEV1% ≥80. Increased risk was noted for all grades of PMLs and cancers, with the risk being almost 8 times for squamous dysplasia [Odds ratio = 7.95; 95%confidence interval (CI) =1.77–35.6]. Similarly, FEV-1/FVC ratio of <50% was associated with 3 times greater risk of detecting a PML/cancer. When COPD was classified based on GOLD criteria, the patients with severe COPD had 2.7 times and 4.8 times greater risk of being detected with SM and SD, respectively. The risk persisted for SD even when an age standardized classification was used to define COPD. COPD patients also had a non-statistically significant 2.5 times greater risk of their baseline lesion progressing to a higher grade [Hazard Ratio 2.48 (95% CI 0.65 – 9.41), p-value - 0.18)]. The mean time to progression from a lower grade lesion to a higher grade was 27 months for patients with COPD and 50 months for patients without COPD. Conclusion: Impaired LF can be a good predictor of occurrence and progression of PMLs in central airways of high risk patients. Spirometric measurement of lung function can be used as an additional tool for identifying target populations in need of more aggressive LC surveillance. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(1 Suppl):A22.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Prevention ResearchSame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207