MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P4-S3.02 Subtyping of Treponema pallidum strains by sequence analysis of tp0279 and tp0548

2011· article· en· W1970794943 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allan Pillay, Chao‐Ying Chen, Muhammad Morshed, S. Philip, R C Ballard

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubtypingTypingTreponemaAmpliconSequence analysisBiologyVirologyGeneticsMedicinePolymerase chain reactionSyphilisGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The goal of the study was to evaluate two sequence-based subtyping methods for their ability to further differentiate Treponema pallidum strains characterised by the CDC typing system. Methods 12 clinical specimens with the 14d strain type obtained from patients with GUD in Cape Town in 2000; 14 specimens with the 14d strain type from patients with primary or secondary syphilis in San Francisco collected between 2004 and 2007; and 12 clinical specimens with the 14d strain type collected between 2000 and 2002 from a syphilis outbreak in Vancouver were included in the study. Specimens were previously characterised using the CDC typing method which involves analysis of the sequence variability with tprE, G, and J and, the variable number of 60-bp tandem repeats within the arp gene. Subtyping was performed by PCR amplification of a homonucleotide G" tandem repeat within tp0279 and a variable region within tp0548. PCR amplicons were purified and directly sequenced using the BigDye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit and an ABI 3130 sequencer. Results Of the 12 samples from South Africa, sequence analysis of tp0279 revealed three subtypes (9G, 10G, 11G) and combining this data with the CDC typing method produced strain subtypes 14d9, 14d10, and 14d11. Sequence analysis of the variable region within tp0548 resulted in five subtypes designated a, c, f, k, and l among these samples and, combination with strain type using the CDC method produced subtypes 14d/a, 14d/c, 14d/f, 14d/k, 14d/l. All 14 samples from San Francisco had 9G tandem repeats within tp0279 resulting in subtype 14d9. Sequence analysis of the variable region within tp0548 resulted in 3 subtypes designated f, g and j among these 14 samples and incorporation of the CDC typing method produced subtypes 14d/f, 14d/g, and 14d/j. Of the 12 samples from Vancouver, sequence analysis of tp0279 produced two subtypes (8G, 9G) resulting in strain subtypes 14d8 (1/12) and14d9 (11/12). Sequencing of tp0548 also produced two subtypes (e, f) resulting in strain subtypes 14d/e (1/12) and14d/f (11/12). Conclusions The tp0279 subtyping method further differentiated 14d strains into four subtypes while the tp0548 method differentiated 14d strains into eight subtypes. Subtyping of strains from the initial syphilis outbreak in Vancouver suggests clonal spread of T pallidum . Both subtyping methods enhanced the original CDC typing method and appear to be promising tools for molecular epidemiological studies on syphilis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.692

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207