Outcome of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance of Multiple Etiologies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) as a technique for correction of fixed sagittal imbalance with multiple etiologies. Summary of Background Data. This report represents the largest and longest series of patients with fixed sagittal imbalance other than ankylosing spondylitis who were managed with PSO. Methods. A total of 140 consecutive patients who had undergone PSO for the management of sagittal imbalance with any etiology were reviewed. Etiologic diagnoses were ankylosing spondylitis in 86 patients, flatback syndrome in 20, post-traumatic kyphosis in 17, congenital kyphoscoliosis in 9, and post-tuberculotic kyphosis in 8 patients. The average duration of the follow-up period was 8 years (range, 5–12.5 yr). Radiological and clinical outcome analyses were performed. Results. All patients showed a solid union upon follow-up radiographs and no pseudarthrosis was noted. Correction with PSO averaged 36.2°. Blood loss averaged 1515.6 mL. The Oswestry Disability Index improved from 40.5 to 18.8 at the last follow-up, and 90.7% of the patients were very or somewhat satisfied. There were 15 cases (10.7%) of reversible complications including transient radiculopathy and 3 cases (2.1%) of irreversible complications. Conclusion. Based on the results of this study, PSO is considered a reliable and relatively safe procedure for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance with multiple etiologies. In 140 cases of kyphosis induced by various causes including ankylosing spondylitis, we attained a correction angle of 36.2°, and the mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 40.5 preoperatively to 18.8 at the last visit. On the Modified Spine Research Society-24 instrument, somewhat satisfying results were found in 90.7%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".