MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970840249 · doi:10.4161/cc.6.5.3926

G2 Checkpoint Kinase Inhibitors Exert Their Radiosensitizing Effects Prior to the G2/M Transition

2007· article· en· W1970840249 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher M. Sturgeon, Michel Roberge

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsG2-M DNA damage checkpointCHEK1Clonogenic assayCancer researchDNA damageBiologyMitosisCell cycle checkpointCell cycleKinaseDNA repairIn vivoWee1ApoptosisCell biologyDNAGeneticsCyclin-dependent kinase 1

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical inhibitors of the G2 checkpoint can sensitize p53-defective cancer cells to DNA damage and several are in preclinical or clinical development. These compounds are commonly thought to increase killing at the G2/M transition by forcing cells to divide with unrepaired DNA. We examined the effects of the ATM/ATR inhibitor caffeine and the Chk1 inhibitor isogranulatimide on the clonogenic survival of two p53-defective cell lines, MCF7-mp53 and HCT-116 p53-/- cells, when added at different times after exposure to ionizing radiation. Exposure 16-24 h after irradiation, when G2 arrest is maximal, forced premature entry into mitosis but increased clonogenic survival. Radiosensitization occurred mostly upon exposure between 2 and 16 h after irradiation, correlating with S-phase traversal. These results suggest that inhibition of the S phase activities of ATM/ATR and Chk1 may be more relevant to radiosensitization of p53-defective cells than G2 checkpoint abrogation and that careful scheduling of combination treatments might be required for synergistic antitumour effects in vivo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFrench-language works237,207