Inhibitors of Histone Deacetylases and DNA Methyltransferases Alter Imprinted Gene Regulation in Embryonic Stem Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pluripotent embryonic stem cells are able to differentiate into a variety of cell types, thereby making them a valuable source for transplantation medicine. Recent studies have reported the use of pharmacological agents, namely 5-Aza-Cytidine (5AzaC) and Trichostatin A (TSA), to guide embryonic stem (ES) cells to differentiate into specific cellular lineages. However, those drugs are known to be potent inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases and/or histone deacetylases. Since both epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the expression of imprinted genes in fetal and adult somatic tissues, it is essential to investigate further the role of these agents in regulating imprinted gene expression in embryonic cells. Embryonic stem cells were exposed to 5AzaC and TSA and analyzed for transcript abundance of a number of imprinted and non-imprinted marker genes. Most imprinted gene transcripts increased following exposure to 5AzaC or TSA alone and responded in either an additive or synergistic manner when exposed to both drugs together. Interestingly, transcript levels of several imprinted genes remained high and in some cases, increased further after drug removal or even after passaging the cells, indicating a long lasting and retarded effect on gene expression. Together, our results suggest that DNA methylation and histone acetylation play jointly an important epigenetic role in governing imprinted gene expression in embryonic stem cells. Moreover, these results describe the sensitivity and irreversibility of embryonic stem cells to epigenetic modifiers, highlighting potential risks for their use in therapeutic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".