MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970899892 · doi:10.1159/000182571

Leukemia in Growth-Hormone Treated Patients: An Update, 1992

2008· review· en· W1970899892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHormone Research · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLeukemiaFanconi anemiaChemotherapyInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)Radiation therapyOncologyGrowth hormone deficiencyGrowth hormonePediatricsHormoneGastroenterologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1988 the number of growth hormone (GH)-treated patients has markedly increased worldwide. To date, leukemia has been observed in 31 patients during or following GH therapy and related malignancies in 2 further patients. Leukemia occurred in 10 patients in Japan, 10 in the USA, and 10 in Europe, and in 1 patient in Canada. In 29 patients GH therapy had been started in 1975 or later. The onset of leukemia was 1984 or later in 28 patients with a mean time between the start of GH therapy and leukemia onset of 5.0 (0.2-18.8) years. Patients had received both pituitary and recombinant GH in moderate doses. In 15 patients definite additional leukemia risk was evident: Fanconi anemia in 2, myelodysplastic syndrome in 1, Bloom's syndrome in 1, radiation for brain tumor (+chemotherapy) in 9, chemotherapy in 2. The leukemic patients without a strong additional risk do not represent a definitely higher leukemia incidence worldwide, except for Japan where the occurrence is higher than expected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it