The clinical course of ulcerative colitis after orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: further appraisal of immunosuppression post transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The course of ulcerative colitis (UC) following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is unclear. We documented the nationwide experience of the course of UC, before and after OLT for PSC. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 470 liver transplants were performed for 413 patients between 1992 and 2003, in the Scottish Liver Transplantation Unit, UK. Twenty-six patients had co-existing UC/PSC. Of these, data from 20 patients were studied over a median period of 11.9 years before OLT and 4.4 years after OLT; of the others, four patients required colectomy prior to OLT, one died within 7 days of transplant, and one developed UC after transplant. A significantly higher relapse rate (number of relapses/year of follow-up) was seen after OLT (median 1.0 versus 0.3; interquartile range, 0.10-1.42 and 0.01-0.40, respectively; P = 0.007). The corticosteroids requirement (number of courses/year of follow-up) after OLT was also significantly higher (0.40 versus 0.10; interquartile range, 0.51-1.13 and 0.05-0.12, respectively; P = 0.003). Twenty per cent of patients (4/20) became corticosteroid dependent after OLT. Thirty-five per cent of patients (7/20) underwent colectomy after OLT: three for severe disease and four for neoplasia/dysplasia. Five patients (19%) developed neoplasia following OLT. CONCLUSION: Despite immunosuppression, UC follows a more aggressive clinical course after OLT and is associated with a high rate of neoplasia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".