MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970947291 · doi:10.1137/s0036141099351188

Identification of Two-Phase Free Boundary Arising in Plasma Physics

2000· article· en· W1970947291 on OpenAlex
June‐Yub Lee, Jin Keun Seo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmegaConvexityMathematicsBoundary (topology)PlasmaDomain (mathematical analysis)Mathematical analysisPhase (matter)CombinatoricsNorm (philosophy)GeometryPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We try to estimate the shape and the location of two-phase free boundary which has been studied in [A. Friedman and Y. Liu, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4), 22 (1995), pp. 375--448] to model a stationary magnetohydrodynamics system. A sufficient condition is obtained to check whether a test disk is included in the plasma region D surrounded by a two-phase free boundary. In the test disk technique, only two simply verifiable conditions are used and indispensableness of the conditions is demonstrated using an example. The technique is applicable to select some of test disks placed in the domain $\Omega$, which gives a rough guess on the shape of plasma region. Next we draw some geometrical properties of plasma region D when the domain $\Omega$ possesses a kind of convexity. It is proved that if $\Omega$ itself contains the mirror image of the right portion $\{x \in \Omega : x \cdot \xi > t \}$ of the domain with respect to a line $\{x: x \cdot \xi = t \}$ for all t > t0 , then so does the plasma region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it