Pharmacokinetics of Raltegravir in the Semen of HIV-Infectedmen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the pharmacokinetic disposition of raltegravir in the blood and seminal plasma of HIV-infected men. METHODS: We conducted a pharmacokinetic study using a staggered sampling approach. A total of 16 HIV-infected men receiving raltegravir-based therapy were recruited into the study. Each participant provided six blood plasma and six seminal plasma samples for quantification of drug concentrations in both compartments. Blood and semen samples were obtained within 1 h of each other and were collected prior to the morning dose and at 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 h post-ingestion. Drug concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A total of 96 semen samples and 96 blood samples were obtained from all participants during the study period. The median age and baseline CD4(+) T-cell count of the study participants were 48 years (IQR 42-53) and 450 cells/mm(3) (IQR 289-585). Virological suppression to <50 copies/ml had been maintained for a median of 21 months (IQR 7-35) at the time of study enrolment. The median seminal plasma-to-blood plasma ratios and AUC0-12 h seminal plasma-to-blood plasma ratios of raltegravir were 3.25 (IQR 1.46-5.37) and 2.26 (IQR 1.05-4.45), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concentrations of raltegravir in seminal plasma are several fold higher than those attained in blood plasma and those required to inhibit viral replication in this compartment. Further research examining the therapeutic and prophylactic implications of these findings is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".