Les poids de Malia entre les premiers et les seconds palais : un essai de mise en contexte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The weights for measuring found at Malia (MM IB-LM I-II) have already been the subject of some consideration, particularly those from the Mu Quarter. The discovery of another specimen in the Nu Quarter provides an opportunity to reconsider the documentation in its entirety: typology, metrology, dating and contexts. As regards the typology and metrology, a development can be observed in the system of weighing at Malia from the Protopalatial to the Neopalatial Period: during the first period the weights, of varying shapes, are usually of stone and the units evidenced are the smallest units, suited to precision measurements (f, w, k); in the following period, there are only lead weights in the shape of discs, based on the "Aegean" unit x. A general analysis of the contextual data, on the other hand, clearly shows the constant relationship between the weighing on the one hand and the stocking, artisanal and domestic production, and accounting and administrative operations on the other, without any chronological difference.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".