Choroid Plexus Tumors in Children: Significance of Stromal Invasion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A group of choroid plexus tumors fit the cellular criteria for choroid plexus papilloma (CPP) except for invasion into the adjacent parenchyma, with associated loss of the normal villus architecture at the site of invasion. These tumors retain a benign cellular appearance. In the existing literature, it is unclear whether these tumors are classified as choroid plexus carcinomas or as CPPs. In our experience, although evidence of invasion is present, these tumors tend to exhibit benign behavior. We suggest that stromal invasion of this type remains consistent with a benign clinical course, although surgical results may demonstrate higher morbidity rates, given the invasive nature of the tumors. The failure to classify these tumors as CPPs may explain some of the variability in outcomes reported for various studies. METHODS: To study this question, clinical and histological data for children diagnosed with CPPs (either with or without stromal invasion) between 1985 and 1995 were examined. Only cases with pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging data were included in the series. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients with CPPs were identified, with 4 tumors being notable for stromal invasion. After gross total tumor removal, none of the eight children with CPPs received adjuvant therapy at our institution; all are alive without evidence of tumor recurrence after surgical excision (mean, 108 mo). Of the four patients with stromal invasion, three underwent gross total resection. The one patient who underwent subtotal resection received chemotherapy at another facility. All four of these patients are alive, after a mean of 100 months of follow-up monitoring. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that CPPs with a benign cellular appearance but with evidence of local parenchymal invasion and loss of the normal villus architecture at the site of invasion be classified as CPPs. Patients with these tumors respond to surgical therapy alone, without the need for adjuvant treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".