MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971022418 · doi:10.1002/fuce.200900059

A Three‐Dimensional Non‐isothermal Model of High Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells with Phosphoric Acid Doped Polybenzimidazole Membranes

2010· article· en· W1971022418 on OpenAlexafffund
Kui Jiao, X. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFuel Cells · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhosphoric acidProton exchange membrane fuel cellMembraneIsothermal processMaterials scienceChemical engineeringStoichiometryOxygenOperating temperatureDopingCarbon monoxideCatalysisAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryChromatographyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT‐PEMFCs) with phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole (PBI) membranes have gained tremendous attentions due to its attractive advantages over conventional PEMFCs such as faster electrochemical kinetics, simpler water management, higher carbon monoxide (CO) tolerance and easier cell cooling and waste heat recovery. In this study, a three‐dimensional non‐isothermal model is developed for HT‐PEMFCs with phosphoric acid doped PBI membranes. A good agreement is obtained by comparing the numerical results with the published experimental data. Numerical simulations have been carried out to investigate the effects of operating temperature, phosphoric acid doping level of the PBI membrane, inlet relative humidity (RH), stoichiometry ratios of the feed gases, operating pressure and air/oxygen on the cell performance. Numerical results indicate that increasing both the operating temperature and phosphoric acid doping level are favourable for improving the cell performance. Humidifying the feed gases at room temperature has negligible improvement on the cell performance, and further humidification is needed for a meaningful performance enhancement. Pressurising the cell and using oxygen instead of air all have significant improvements on the cell performance, and increasing the stoichiometry ratios only helps prevent the concentration loss at high current densities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations81
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuel CellsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207