Eradication of vancomycin resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> from a paediatric oncology unit and prevalence of colonization in hospitalized and community-based children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously reported an outbreak of vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) in a paediatric oncology unit in December 1995 which was associated with widespread environmental contamination of the unit with VRE. We undertook this study to evaluate the effectiveness of the infection control policy instituted subsequent to the outbreak and to investigate the underlying prevalence of VRE colonization in hospitalized, outpatient and community-based children. We sought to establish the molecular similarity of VRE isolates from the study. Stool specimens were obtained from outpatients at risk of VRE, hospital inpatients and from healthy community-based children. VRE colonization was eradicated from the inpatient unit within 11 months, but in outpatients, 16 months after the outbreak, 4 of 137 (2.9 %) attending oncology outpatients, 5 of 65 (7.7%) with cystic fibrosis and 1 of 12 (8.3 %) with liver disease were found to be colonized with VRE. The isolates were all Enterococcus faecium, Van A phenotype except one E. casseliflavus of the Van C phenotype. All were unique in SmaI DNA macrorestriction patterns with the exception of two isolates, which were similar to the original outbreak strain and three further isolates of a single strain but which differed from the outbreak strain. Of 315 hospital inpatients, 2.5 % were colonized with VRE of the Van C resistance phenotype but VRE was not detected in 116 healthy, community-based children. We conclude that effective strategies can successfully control spread of VRE but despite a low prevalence of VRE colonization in hospital patients and in community-based children, outbreaks can occur when infection control practices are not optimal. Continued vigilance to detect VRE and limit spread within hospitals is therefore necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".