Relationship between frontostriatal morphology and executive function deficits in bipolar I disorder following a first manic episode: data from the Systematic Treatment Optimization Program for Early Mania (<scp>STOP</scp>‐<scp>EM</scp>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Executive function impairments are a core feature of bipolar I disorder (BD-I), not only present during acute episodes but also persisting following remission of mood symptoms. Despite advances in knowledge regarding the neural basis of executive functions in healthy subjects, research into morphological abnormalities underlying the deficits in BD-I is lacking. METHODS: Patients with BD-I within three months of sustained remission from their first manic episode (n = 41) underwent neuropsychological testing and a 3T magnetic resonance imaging scan and were compared to healthy subjects matched for age, sex, and premorbid IQ (n = 30). Group dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; Brodmann areas 9 and 46) and caudate volumes were examined and analyzed for relationships with the average score from three computerized tests of executive function: Spatial Working Memory, Stockings of Cambridge, and Intradimensional/Extradimensional Shift. RESULTS: Right caudate volumes were enlarged in patients (z = 3.57, p < 0.05 corrected). No differences in DLPFC volumes were found. Patients showed large deficits in executive function relative to healthy subjects (d = -0.92, p < 0.001). While in healthy subjects, a larger right (r = +0.39, p < 0.05) and left (r = +0.44, p < 0.05) caudate was associated with better executive function score, in patients, larger right (r = -0.36, p < 0.05) and left (r = -0.34, p < 0.05) volumes correlated with poorer performance. CONCLUSIONS: Although the etiology of gray matter changes is unknown, volume increases in the right caudate may be an important factor underlying executive function impairments during remission in patients with BD-I.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".