Valproate-induced hyperammonaemic encephalopathy: review of 14 cases in the psychiatric setting
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review signs and symptoms of valproate-induced hyperammonaemic encephalopathy without hepatotoxicity in the psychiatric setting, explore its mechanisms, and give recommendations for prevention and treatment. METHODS: Medline search with keywords valproate, ammonia, hyperammonaemia, encephalopathy, and then cross-references to articles obtained through this search. Only cases with indication of valproate for psychiatric condition were included. RESULTS: Fourteen cases published in the psychiatric setting are reviewed. Valproate-induced hyperammonaemic encephalopathy is a rare adverse event, occurring almost equally in men and women, with a large age range, and reported in two patients with mental retardation. Symptoms appeared either a few days after initiation of valproate therapy, or after several months or years. The main symptoms were fluctuations in consciousness and disorientation. Clinical severity was not related to blood ammonia levels. All patients recovered after valproate-induced hyperammonaemic encephalopathy diagnosis and treatment, usually involving discontinuation of valproate. CONCLUSIONS: Valproate-induced hyperammonaemic encephalopathy is rare and usually reversible in patients without urea cycle disorders when valproate is discontinued. Therapy with carnitine is recommended. Special caution should be used in patients with mental retardation. Psychiatrists should suspect valproate-induced hyperammonaemic encephalopathy when consciousness deteriorates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it