Simulation, dynamic testing and design of micromachined flexible joints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the simulation, dynamic testing and design of micromachined flexible joints. The objective is to mimic the kinematics of classical macro rotating and sliding joints with flexural micro joints. The joints consist of long slender beams that are folded in a variety of shapes: `I', `H', `X', `S', `U' and `V' shaped joints are considered. Finite element modelling simulations are used to simulate rotational, axial and out-of-plane stiffness and examine the effect of variations in joint length and beam angles. The simulation results are compared to a series of dynamic tests of polysilicon micromachined joints. The resonant frequencies of joint-mass systems were measured using a non-contact laser reflectance apparatus and the derived experimental rotational stiffnesses were found to agree with simulations. Design guidelines for the selection of the optimum joint shape and length for given functional requirements such as directional stiffness, selective compliance and range of motion are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".