Reduction of trachoma in the absence of antibiotic treatment: Evidence from a population-based survey in Malawi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: A survey was conducted in Chikwawa District, Malawi in order to compare the current prevalence of trachoma with a similar survey in 1983. METHODS: Using random cluster household sampling, children aged 1 to 6 and adults aged 50 or older were enumerated and examined for the presence of trachoma. RESULTS: Among the 1313 children enumerated, 1249 (95.1%) were examined and among the 1431 adults enumerated, 1221 (85.3%) were examined. The prevalence of active trachoma among the children was 13.9% (11.9-15.9%), 10.0% in males and 14.4% in females. The prevalence of active trachoma varied significantly among the 25 clusters, ranging from 3.9% to 38.2% with 5 clusters (20%) having a prevalence >20%. Signs of trachomatous trichiasis were observed in 1.0% of adults examined. Active disease in 1999 was associated with a longer distance to the primary water source. CONCLUSIONS: Since 1983 there has been no mass antibiotic treatment programme in the district and little change in socioeconomic status. However, compared to the 1983 findings, active trachoma has been reduced by over 50% (p < 0.001) and trachomatous trichiasis by over 80%. In the 16-year interim (especially in the past 7 years) health, water and hygiene programmes were initiated and we hypothesize that the reduction in active disease is likely due to these changes. Our findings suggest that sustained reductions in active trachoma can be achieved without community-based antibiotic distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it