MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1971175835 · doi:10.3747/co.21.2077

Proffered Papers and Posters Submitted to the Fifth International Symposium on Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, BRCA: Twenty Years of Advances

2014· article· en· W1971175835 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Eric T. Rosenthal, Kelsey Moyes, Christopher Arnell, Richard Wenstrup

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryHuntsman Cancer Institute
KeywordsFounder effectOvarian cancerMedicineGenetic testingBRCA mutationMutationBreast cancerGeneticsCancerPopulationBRCA2 ProteinOncologyGermline mutationGeneInternal medicineBiologyHaplotypeGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: It is estimated that 1–2% of individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) ancestry carry one of three pathogenic founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Targeted testing for these mutations (BRCA1 187delAG and 5385insC, and BRCA2 6174delT) is therefore recommended for all AJ breast and ovarian cancer patients, regardless of age of diagnosis or family history. Comprehensive analysis of both genes is recommended for a subset of AJ patients in whom founder mutations are not identified, but estimates of the yield from comprehensive analysis in this population vary widely. Methods: We sought to establish the proportion of non-founder mutations in AJ patients undergoing clinical testing in our laboratory from January 2006 through August 2013. Analysis included AJ patients for whom: (1) comprehensive testing was ordered as the initial test, or (2) founder mutation testing was ordered with instructions to “reflex” to comprehensive analysis if negative. The latter group was limited to cases where the reflex testing was ordered on the original test request form, and not cancelled for any reason other than the detection of a founder mutation. Results: The percentage of non-founder mutations detected in these groups was 13% (104/802) and 7.2% (198/2769) respectively. We detected 189 unique non-founder mutations, 76 in BRCA1 and 113 in BRCA2. BRCA2 4075delGT was detected in 15 patients. The next most common mutations, found in 7 patients each, were BRCA1 5055delG, BRCA2 1982delA, and BRCA2 R3128X. Conclusions: Non-founder mutations make up between 13% and 7.2% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in patients reporting AJ ancestry. These numbers may represent underestimates if some patients were ascertained for testing based on the identification of a founder mutation in a relative. These numbers suggest that the prevalence of non-founder mutations in AJ individuals may be comparable to the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in non-AJ individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3270.128

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Oncology→Same topicBRCA gene mutations in cancer→French-language works237,207→