Electromagnetic Scattering From 3-D Targets in a Random Medium Using Finite Difference Frequency Domain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper a three-dimensional (3-D) numerical technique based on the finite difference frequency domain (FDFD) is implemented to calculate the scattering from arbitrary shaped objects embedded in a continuous random medium. The total field/scattered field (TF/SF) algorithm is integrated with the FDFD to minimize the memory consumption and speed up the calculations. For validation purposes, the radar cross-section of a 2-D conducting cylinder in random medium is calculated using the FDFD technique and compared to previously published data based on the current generator method. An upgrade to a 3-D solver was then inspired once the idea of using the multi-grid technique was introduced to accelerate the convergence rate of the BICGSTAB iterative solver. Thus, allowing the FDFD technique to become a robust method to solve the scattering problem from large targets embedded in random medium. Therefore, using the introduced simulating scheme, one can easily elucidate any scattering information out of real life targets surrounded by random environmental effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it