Note. Growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in lobster homogenates at different temperatures / Nota. Crecimiento de Vibrio parahaemolyticus en langosta a diferentes temperaturas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the illnesses associated with the presence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafoods, its survival in lobster was studied. Lobster homogenates were prepared, sterilized, inoculated with the bacteria, and incubated at -25 °C, 6 °C and 28 °C, for 60 days. Different viable cell counting methods were employed. The results of the McFarland nephelometric standard method and the direct count of viable bacterial cells, (DVC) were not significantly different (p = 0.5). However, the DVC method was better for detecting viable cells at low numbers for longer times, especially for cultures incubated at -25 °C. Therefore, this method, and the plate count (PC) method for counting colony forming units, were selected for monitoring the survival of V. parahaemolyticus under each temperature of incuba tion. The greatest survival of the bacterium was at ambient (28 °C) temperature. At freezer tempera ture (-25 °C), no viable cells were detected towards the end of the experiments. However, the cultures kept at 6 °C were viable until the end of the incubation period, these results being different from previously published works conducted at refrigeration temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".