Visible photoluminescence from a nanocrystalline porous silicon structure fabricated by a plasma hydrogenation and annealing method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thin film nanocrystalline porous silicon layers have been fabricated from amorphous silicon films using dc plasma hydrogenation and subsequent annealing at temperatures about 450°C on silicon substrates. Plasma power densities about 5.5W∕cm2 were found to be suitable for etching of the silicon film and the creation of nanoporous layers. The nanoporous structures show visible luminescence at room temperature as confirmed by photoluminescence spectroscopy. The effects of plasma power and annealing temperature on the grain size and luminescence properties of these layers have been investigated by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, photoluminescence, and cathodoluminescence. It was observed that by lowering the temperature during the hydrogenation step, the diameter of the grains increased, whereas lowering the plasma power density caused the distribution of the porous surface structures to become less widely distributed and the formation of more packed structures. In addition, infrared spectroscopy has been used to investigate the origin of the light emitting behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".