Light and electron microscopy of teliospores and teliospore germination in the rust fungus <i>Coleosporium ipomoeae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A combination of light, scanning, and transmission electron microscopy was used to examine teliospores and teliospore germination in the rust fungus Coleosporium ipomoeae (Schw.) Burrill, a parasite of the wild morning glory Ipomoea coccinea L. Telia developed on abaxial surfaces of infected leaves and appeared as orange, waxy crusts usually associated with uredinia. Mature teliospores were cylindrical to slightly clavate in shape and thin-walled. The presence of chitin in the spore wall was demonstrated using wheat germ agglutinin gold labeling. Teliospores were surrounded by an electron-dense extracellular material. Each spore possessed a large prominent nucleus containing synaptonemal complexes indicative of prophase I meiotic nuclei. Following hydration, the nucleus of each spore completed meiosis and the spore was divided into four uninucleate compartments by the formation of three transverse septa. Each compartment gave rise to a germ tube into which the nucleus and cytoplasm migrated. Germ tubes developed into long slender sterigmata that grew through the extracellular material within the telium to become exposed on the leaf surface. A basidiospore then developed at the tip of each sterigma. Once the nucleus moved from the sterigma into the spore, a septum formed to delimit the spore from the tip of the sterigma.Key words: fungal spores, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, high pressure freezing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".