MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phylogeography, introgression, and population structure of the eastern North American birches Betula alleghaniensis, B. papyrifera, and B. lenta

2013· dissertation· en· W19712568 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ashley M. Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive BioMedicine Online · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConcordia UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhylogeographyIntrogressionBiologyGenetic structureEcologyPopulationRefugium (fishkeeping)Allopatric speciationGenetic variationGeneticsPhylogeneticsHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CGG repeat stretch in the FMR1 gene is polymorphic, ranging from 5 to 50 repeats in the normal population. Expansion of the repeats to the premutation range (50-200) has been associated with premature ovarian failure (POF). This case-control study was conducted to enumerate CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene in 80 Indian women with non-familial, non-syndromic POF, and 70 controls from the same ethnicity. A possible association between CGG repeats and endocrine profile of these cases was investigated. All patients and controls had CGG repeats in the normal polymorphic range. Serum FSH concentrations were significantly raised in both POF cases and controls having CGG repeats in the 31-40 repeats range (P < 0.0001). POF cases and controls had FSH concentrations of 133.7 versus 84.2 mIU/ml and 16.0 versus 6.2 mIU/ml for >30 repeats versus <30 repeats respectively. Inhibin B concentrations were not associated with CGG repeats. The results of this study indicate that FMR1 premutations are rare in sporadic cases of POF with no family history of fragile X syndrome. However, although in the normal polymorphic range, expansion of the CGG repeat tract to beyond 30 repeats was associated with serum FSH concentrations in both POF cases and controls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive BioMedicine OnlineSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207