MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971340477 · doi:10.1039/b913799h

Thermoelectric properties of n-type double substituted SrTiO<sub>3</sub>bulk materials

2009· article· en· W1971340477 on OpenAlexafffund
Yanjie Cui, Jian He, G. Amow, Holger Kleinke

Bibliographic record

VenueDalton Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaClemson UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsSpark plasma sinteringThermoelectric effectSeebeck coefficientMaterials scienceThermal conductivityRietveld refinementElectrical resistivity and conductivityFigure of meritThermal conductionThermoelectric materialsAtmospheric temperature rangeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fermi levelCondensed matter physicsSinteringCrystal structureCrystallographyChemistryThermodynamicsOptoelectronicsComposite materialElectronPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of La, Ta double substituted Sr(1-x)La(x)Ti(1-x)Ta(x)O(3), with x = 0.01, 0.05 and 0.10, and La, Nb double substituted Sr(0.90)La(0.10)Ti(0.90)Nb(0.10)O(3) for comparison were investigated in this project. Rietveld refinements were performed to check for purity and symmetry reduction. Electronic structure calculations indicate n-type conduction with steep and flat bands in the vicinity of the Fermi level for x = 0.125. Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, and thermal conductivity measurements on hot-pressed and spark-plasma-sintered samples were performed over a wide range of temperatures. Best results were obtained by spark-plasma-sintering of double substituted Sr(0.99)La(0.01)Ti(0.99)Ta(0.01)O(3) with a thermoelectric figure-of-merit of 0.13 at 660 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalton TransactionsSame topicAdvanced Thermoelectric Materials and DevicesFrench-language works237,207