MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Universal approach to pharmacokinetic monitoring of immunosuppressive agents in children

2002· article· en· W1971361422 on OpenAlexaff
Guido Filler, Nathalie Lepage, Gundo Weiler, Ingrid Mai

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Transplantation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacokineticsConfidence intervalTherapeutic drug monitoringTacrolimusUrologyArea under the curveMycophenolic acidTrough levelConcomitantPharmacologyTransplantationTrough ConcentrationCalcineurinGastroenterologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current data indicate that pharmacokinetic (PK) monitoring of cyclosporin microemulsion (CsA) should be performed using the 2-h concentration (C2), that tacrolimus (Tac) is commonly monitored using the trough level, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) should be monitored using the 1-h (C1), 2-h (C2) and 6-h (C6) concentrations. The three differing time-point requirements are cumbersome, and we aimed to develop universal guidelines for all three drugs using a large number of full PK profiles in children. One-hundred and twenty two stable pediatric patients, receiving either CsA (165 PK profiles, 69 patients, 24 with concomitant MMF) or Tac (122 PK profiles, 53 patients, 18 with MMF) were analyzed retrospectively. Pearson r for the CsA C2 was 0.90 [95% confidence interval(CI): 0.86-0.92], for Tac C2 r was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90), and for MPA C2 r was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68-0.83), respectively. For MPA, at least three time-points are required to accurately estimate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and C1, C2 and C6 serve as best markers. Excellent AUC estimations could be obtained from a limited sampling strategy from C1, C2 and C6 or C0, C1, C2 and C4 with clinically acceptable errors for all three drugs. The AUC can be estimated with great precision by using an identical approach for all three drugs. Target AUCs for a given time-point after transplantation remain to be established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric TransplantationSame topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207