MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971420464 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2004.0011

Muddy Allegiance and Shiny Booty: Aphra Behn's Anglo-Dutch Politics

2004· article· en· W1971420464 on OpenAlex
Rebecca S. Wolsk

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Crisis of the 21st Century
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAphraAllegiancePoliticsHistoryArtLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Muddy Allegiance and Shiny Booty: Aphra Behn's Anglo-Dutch Politics Rebecca S. Wolsk Over the past twenty-five years, revisionist studies ofAphra Behn have illuminated the political subtexts and endeavours in her work. Several scholars have reconciled herToryismwith herfeminism, on behalfofmodern readers, who mayfind that type ofpoliticaljuxtaposition harder to comprehend than Behn's contemporaries might have. In the 1990s, Ros Ballaster and Toni Bowers drew on the work of Susan Staves to illuminate how Behn's amatory fictions register contemporary anxiety about the credibility and endurance of oatiSs of allegiance. More recently, surveys byJanet Todd and Derek Hughes have further contextualized Behn within keyRestoration moments (the Popish Plot, the emergence ofWhigandTorypartisanship during the Exclusion crisis, and the Glorious Revolution). As efforts to understand Behn's beliefs and constraints move forward, Behn scholarship must better acknowledge die significance ofdie Low Countries in herwork and die importance ofthatregion to die murkypolitical waters thatshe and her contemporaries navigated.1 1 See Ros Ballaster, Seductive Forms: Women's Amatory Fiction from 1684 to 1740 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), esp. 78-79; Susan Staves, Players'Scepters:Fictions ofAuthority in the Restoration (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1979); Toni O'Shaughnessy Bowers, "Sex, Lies, and Invisibility: Amatory Fictìon from die Restoradon to Mid-Century," The Columbia History oftheBritishNovel, ed.John Richetti (NewYork: Columbia UniversityPress, EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 17, Number !,October 2004 2 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION Before the Protestant Dutch stadholder William III replaced his Cadiolic uncle and fatiher-in-lawJames II as king of England during the winter of 1688-89, England and die Dutch United Provinces fought against each other in three wars (1652-54, 1665-67, and 1672-74). Revisionist critics, who otherwise contextualize the "political Behn" so astutely, have overlooked the contemporary importance ofthe Dutch settings and the Dutch protagonist, Octavio, in Behn's uhree-part novel Love-Letters Between a Nobleman and His Sister. Love-Letterscriticism marginalizes Octavio because he is seen as a relatively apolitical, amatory saint in contrast to the historically based, transgressive characters ofSilvia, Philander, and Caesario. In repoliticizing Octavio, his hodgepodge ofcontradictory characteristics (that is, aristocratic republican, "papist" Dutchman) simultaneously activates and disproves Restoration-era "Hollandophobia." This complex deployment of anti-Dutch tropes supported Behn's overarching effort to titillate and Tory-fy her readers.2 Octavio's aspect as rivalrous suitor bears provocative similarities to suitor pairings in her more overtly Hollandophobic texts: TheDutch Lover, and die untitled epistolary tale ofVanderAlbert and Van Bruin from her posdiumously published memoirs.3 In Oroonoko, allusions to 1994), 63-67; Derek Hughes, The Theatre ofAphra Behn (NewYork: Palgrave, 2001);Janet Todd, The Secret Life ofAphra Behn (London: Pandora, 2000). Todd recommended die study of Behn's relationship to France and the Low Countries during the 1999 International Conference on Behn. See "The Roundtable Discussion," Aphra Behn (1640-1689): Identity, AUerity, Ambiguity, ed. Mary Ann O'Donnell, Bernard Dhuicq, and Guyonne Leduc (Paris: L'Harmattan, 2000).Jacqueline Pearson has recendy highlighted Behn's striking interest in Europe, aligning it widi her Toryism in "Dutch Lovers and Odier Europeans in Aphra Behn's Comedies" (paper presented at die Colloque International at die Sorbonne, Paris, France.July 2003), 1. 1 must üiankjacqueline Pearson for sharing diis conference paperwidi me prior to publication. Forafictionalized portrait of Behn diat emphasizes her Anglo-Dutch context, see Jane Stevenson, The Shadow King (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003). 2 Simon Schama uses die term "Hollandophobia" in The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation ofDutch Culture in the Golden Age (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1987). For foundational discussions ofdiis dual purpose, see Ballaster, SeductiveForms, 29, 69-84, 1 13, and William B. Warner, "Licensed by the Market: Behn's Love Letters as Serial Entertainment ," Licensing Entertainment: The Elevation ofNovel Reading in Britain, 1684-1750 (Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press, 1998), 45-87. 3 TheVanderAlbert/Van Bruin narrative appears wiuiin die Antwerp section of TheHistory oftheLifeandMemoirsofMrs. Behn. Written by OneoftheFairSex, in AUtheHistories andNovels Written by theLateIngeniousMrs. Behn, Entire in One Volume, 4di ed. (London: R. Wellington, 1699), http://dewey.Iibrary.upenn.edu/sceti/printedbooksNew/index.cfm? TexuT>=behn_works&PagePosition=3 (accessed 24August 2004), xv-xxx. References are to diis edition. Critics have cautiously attributed die Antwerp section ofdie memoirs to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it