MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971464305 · doi:10.1080/0028825x.2005.9512953

The conservation status of New Zealand's indigenous grasslands

2005· article· en· W1971464305 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. F. Mark, Bruce McLennan

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand Journal of Botany · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRangeland and Wildlife Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersParks CanadaUniversity of OtagoWashburn University
KeywordsTussockGrasslandRangelandGeographyDominance (genetics)Altitude (triangle)AgroforestryEcologyEnvironmental scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The conservation status of New Zealand's indigenous grasslands was assessed against an 1840 baseline, immediately prior to European settlement, when they were of maximum extent. Five major types were recognised, four of them tussock grasslands. The assumed baseline extent of areas with at least some grassland dominance was mapped on the basis of the best available information. Their current extent was derived from the “tussock” category in Land Cover Data Base 1 map (typed as for the baseline map) and the areas formally protected (as at September 2002) from Department of Conservation records. Ecological region boundaries were added and the map information scanned and compiled using ArcGIS. North Island areas were also assessed as one unit while South Island was divided into three geographic regions based on general land use patterns: western wet non‐rangeland, rain‐shadow rangeland, and eastern lower altitude non‐rangeland regions. Of the total baseline extent of indigenous grasslands (82 432 km 2 or c. 31% of the land area), about 13% was low‐alpine snow tussock grassland, 18% montane to subalpine snow tussock grassland, 23% montane to low‐alpine tall red/copper tussock grassland, 44% montane to subalpine short‐tussock grassland, and c. 2% lowland sward grassland. Most grassland (57%) was in the South Island rangeland region which also had the greatest extent of all four major tussock grassland types. Remaining areas of each grassland type vary largely with altitude and climate, the drier lower‐elevation grasslands showing the greatest reduction. Protection of the remaining indigenous grasslands, with various degrees of modification and/or degradation, is greatest in the South Island wet western region (89% of the 98% which remained as of September 2002), with less in the North Island (40% of the remaining 17%), and eastern South Island non‐rangeland region (11% of the remaining 3%). Grassland protection in the rangelands (12% of the remaining 76%) is currently increasing through tenure review of the Crown‐owned pastoral leases in this region. Indigenous temperate grasslands, claimed to be the world's most beleaguered biome (currently 4.59% protected), attain about 12.3% protection of the baseline area in New Zealand (or 28% of the 44% of remaining baseline extent), though biased towards the uplands. Data sets are available as ArcGIS shape files for indigenous grasslands at both 2002 and 1840, on an ecological region basis, as well as for high‐alpine and nival areas for the same periods and regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand Journal of BotanySame topicRangeland and Wildlife ManagementFrench-language works237,207