A group cognitive therapy programme reduced depressive episodes in at risk adolescents at 12 months of follow up
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clarke GN, Hornbrook M, Lynch F, et al. A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents. Arch Gen Psychiatry2001 Dec; 58 : 1127 –34 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTION: In adolescents with depressive symptoms and who have depressed parents, does a group cognitive intervention prevent or delay the onset of the subsequent development of a full depressive episode? Randomised {allocation concealed*}††, blinded {data collectors, data analysts, and study investigators}†,*, controlled trial with 24 months of follow up (median 14 months of follow up). Health maintenance organization (HMO) in Portland, Oregon, USA. 94 adolescents (mean age 15 y, 60% girls) with both subsyndromal depression and a parent with either a current episode of major depression or dysthymia, or an episode in the previous 12 months. 83% were followed for up to 24 months. 45 adolescents were allocated to usual HMO care plus a … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DArchives%2Bof%2BGeneral%2BPsychiatry%26rft.stitle%253DArch%2BGen%2BPsychiatry%26rft.aulast%253DClarke%26rft.auinit1%253DG.%2BN.%26rft.volume%253D58%26rft.issue%253D12%26rft.spage%253D1127%26rft.epage%253D1134%26rft.atitle%253DA%2BRandomized%2BTrial%2Bof%2Ba%2BGroup%2BCognitive%2BIntervention%2Bfor%2BPreventing%2BDepression%2Bin%2BAdolescent%2BOffspring%2Bof%2BDepressed%2BParents%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1001%252Farchpsyc.58.12.1127%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11735841%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpsyc.58.12.1127&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11735841&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febmental%2F5%2F3%2F78.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000172586000004&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".