MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1971543933 · doi:10.1111/1440-1681.12358

Novel method for rapid reversal of drug toxicity: A case report

2015· article· en· W1971543933 on OpenAlexaff
Dean Tatlow, Sreeja Poothencheri, Ranjit Bhangal, Corinne Tatlow

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrugPhenytoinToxicityAlbuminPharmacologyMedicineTherapeutic indexInternal medicineEpilepsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drug toxicity is traditionally treated by reducing the amount of the drug absorbed, enhancing elimination, and providing supportive care. Once the drug has been absorbed, there are few methods that help decrease morbidity and mortality caused by a toxic drug level. Albumin infusion is a new approach that changes that, as it can rapidly reverse a toxic drug level back to a therapeutic level. It is believed with most drugs that the toxic effects are related to the total amount of the free drug. In this method, albumin binds to the free drug and acts as a reservoir or depot from which the drug is slowly released to the free form, thereby limiting the effects of drug toxicity. In this case report, an elderly female patient who experienced phenytoin toxicity was treated with albumin infusion, after which her phenytoin level returned to a therapeutic level with corresponding improvements in her symptoms. Based on our calculations, it was predicted that a small amount of albumin would reverse the patient's toxic symptoms. With this approach, the patient's toxic symptoms improved when free phenytoin levels dropped from 15 to 8 μmol/L. Albumin infusion is a promising new therapy that can rapidly reverse a toxic drug level back to a therapeutic level by binding the free drug to albumin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Experimental Pharmacology and PhysiologySame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207