Hospital Volume as a Predictor for Undergoing Cholecystectomy After Admission for Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We explored whether admission volumes for cholecystectomy (CCY) and pancreatitis were associated with receiving CCY after hospitalization for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP). METHODS: We identified admissions for ABP in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 1998 and 2003. We used multivariate analysis to assess the association between likelihood of CCY and hospital volumes of CCY, pancreatitis, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS: The overall rate of CCY for ABP was 50%. After adjustment for confounders, the likelihood of CCY increased with every quartile of CCY volume relative to the bottom quartile (adjusted odds ratios of 4.36, 7.92, and 12.51 for quartiles 2, 3, and 4, respectively, P < 0.0001). Pancreatitis volume was inversely correlated with likelihood of CCY (adjusted odds ratios of 0.72, 0.62, and 0.48 for quartiles 2, 3, and 4, respectively, vs bottom quartile, P < 0.01). Admissions to hospitals in the top quartile for ERCP volume (>35 ERCPs/yr) had 15% lower odds of CCY than the lowest quartile. Patients from rural areas and with lower income were disproportionately admitted to hospitals with lower CCY volumes. CONCLUSIONS: US hospitals are not achieving targets for CCY after ABP as set by national and international guidelines. Centers with smaller CCY volumes are the least adherent to recommendations for CCY possibly because of hospital-level resource limitations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it