Integration of 101 DNA markers across human Xp11 using a panel of somatic cell hybrids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One hundred and one DNA markers previously assigned to the short arm of the human X chromosome were localized on a hybrid mapping panel consisting of ten radiation-reduced, and four classical somatic cell hybrids. Of the 101 DNA markers, 16 are genes, two are pseudogenes, 13 are expressed sequence tags, 32 are simple tandem repeats (STRs), four are restriction fragment length polymorphisms, one is a variable number of tandem repeats, and 33 are sequence tagged sites (STSs). Three of these markers, two STSs and one STR, were generated from the products of an inter-Alu PCR library of a radiation-reduced hybrid containing Xp11.4-->p11.22 as its only human DNA content. A second STR was isolated from a region-specific cosmid containing the gene ZNF21. The 101 DNA markers fell into 22 bins based on their retention on the hybrids of this panel, which, in combination with YAC contig data, could be further resolved into 24 bins. This hybrid map of Xp11 has an average resolution of approximately 0.8 Mb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".